Eesti keele kui teise keele kirjutamisprotsessi sujuvuse võrdlus keeleoskustasemeti
Abstract
Artikli eesmärk on uurida venekeelsete eesti keele õppijate kirjutamisprotsessi sujuvust ja selle seost “Euroopa keeleõppe raamdokumendi” A2-, B1-, B2- ja C1- keeleoskustasemega. Uurimuses osales 34 venekeelset üliõpilast, kellel paluti kirjutada loovkirjutis haridusteemal. Materjal on kogutud klaviatuuri klahvivajutuste salvestuse meetodil põhineva ScriptLog-programmiga. Sujuvust analüüsitakse kirjutamisprotsessi, lõpliku teksti, paranduste, pauside ning klaviatuuri kasutamisoskuse seisukohast. Lisaks on sujuvus arvutatud vastavalt protsessi ja produkti indikaatoritele. Uurimuse tulemusi võrreldakse keeleoskustasemeti. Tulemused osutavad, et teksti produtseerimine muutub keeleoskuse arenedes sujuvamaks, suurim areng on märgatav B2- ja C1-taseme vahel.
"Comparison of fluency across proficiency levels in the writing process of native Russian-speaking learners of Estonian as a second language"
The aim of the current article is to describe fluency across proficiency levels in the writing process of native Russian-speaking learners of Estonian as a second language. The data of the study consist of texts written by 34 participants, all of whom were students at Tallinn University. The data were collected with the computer keystroke logging program ScriptLog. The written argumentative and narrative texts were rated by two experts according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). The data were representative of four CEFR language proficiency levels: A2 (4 texts), B1 (13), B2 (13), and C1 (4). Fluency was analysed and described according to process, product, revision, pausing behaviour, and keyboard skills. Furthermore, the fluency of the writing process was measured on the basis of online and offline measures. The results of the study were compared across the proficiency levels. The fluency of the writing process increases with growth in proficiency, the greatest development being observed between levels B2 and C1.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alamargot, Denis; Dansac, Christophe; Chesnet, David; Fayol, Michel 2007. Parallel processing before and after pauses: A combined analysis of graphomotor and eye movements during procedural text production. – Gert Rijlaarsdam (Ser. Ed.), Mark Torrance, Luuk van Waes, David Galbraith (Vol. Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications. Studies in Writing, 20, 13–29.
Alves, Rui Alexandre; Castro, São Luís; Sousa, Liliana de; Strömqvist, Sven 2007. Influence of typing skill on pause–execution cycles in written composition. – Gert Rijlaarsdam (Ser. Ed.), Mark Torrance, Luuk van Waes, David Galbraith (Vol. Eds.), Writing and Cognition: Research and Applications. Studies in Writing, 20, 55–65.
Alves, Rui Alexandre; Castro, São Luís; Olive, Thierry 2008. Execution and pauses in writing narratives: Processing time, cognitive effort and typing skill. – International Journal of Psychology, 43 (6), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590701398951
Barbier, Marie-Laure; Spinelli-Jullien, Nicole 2009. On-line tools for investigating writing strategies in L2. – GFL Journal, 2 (3), 23–40.
Breuer, Esther Odilia 2014. First Language versus Foreign Language. Fluency, Errors and Revision Processes in Foreign Language Academic Writing. Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn.
Bruton, Dawn L.; Kirby, Dan R. 1987. Written fluency: Didn’t we do that last year? – The English Journal, 76 (7), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/818661
Chenoweth, N. Ann; Hayes, John R. 2001. Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2. – Written Communication, 18 (1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004
Chenoweth, N. Ann; Hayes, John R. 2003. The inner voice in writing. – Written Communication, 20 (1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253572
Euroopa keeleõppe raamdokument: õppimine, õpetamine ja hindamine. [CEFR.] Tartu: Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, 2007.
Faigley, Lester 1980. Names in search of a concept: Maturity, fluency, complexity, and growth in written syntax. – College Composition and Communication, 31 (3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/356489
Fellner, Terry; Apple, Matthew 2006. Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. – The JALT CALL Journal, 2 (1), 15–26.
Gelderen, Amos van; Oostdam, Ron 2002. Improving linguistic fluency for writing: Effects of explicitness and focus of instruction. – L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2 (3), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021304027877
Hartshorn, James K.; Evans, Norman W.; Merrill, Paul F.; Sudweeks, Richard R.; Strong-Krause, Diane; Anderson, Neil J. 2010. Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. – TESOL Quarterly, 44 (1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781
Hayes, John R. 2012. Modeling and remodeling writing. – Written Communication, 29 (3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Housen, Alex; Kuiken, Folkert 2009. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. – Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
Johnson, Mark D.; Mercado, Leonardo; Acevedo, Anthony 2012. The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. – Journal of Second Language Writing, 21 (3), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.011
Kobayashi, Hiroe; Rinnert, Carol 2013. L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicomponent writer. – Journal of Second Language Writing, 22 (1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.001
Kowal, Iwona 2014. Fluency in second language writing: A developmental perspective. – Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131, 229–246.
Kuhi, Davud; Rasuli, Mortaza Asl; Deylami, Zahra 2014. The effect of type of writing on accuracy, fluency and complexity across proficiency. – Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98 (3), 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.514
Larsen-Freeman, Diane 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. – Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Latif, Muhammad M.Abdel 2009. Toward a new process-based indicator for measuring writing fluency: evidence from L2 writers’ think-aloud protocols. – The Canadian Modern Language Review, 65 (4), 531–558.
Latif, Muhammad M. Abdel 2013. What do we mean by writing fluency and how can it be validly measured? – Applied Linguistics, 34 (1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams073
Leijten, Mariëlle; Waes, Luuk van 2013. Keystroke logging in writing research: Using InputLog to analyze and visualize writing processes. – Written Communication, 30 (3), 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692
Lindgren, Eva; Spelman Miller, Kristyan; Sullivan, Kirk P. H. 2008. Development of fluency and revision in L1 and L2 writing in Swedish high school years eight and nine. – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 133–151. http://doi.org/10.1075/itl.156
Ong, Justina; Zhang, Lawrence Jun 2010. Effects of task complexity on the fluency and lexical complexity in EFL students’ argumentative writing. – Journal of Second Language Writing, 19 (4), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.003
Palviainen, Åsa; Kalaja, Paula; Mäntylä, Katja 2012. Development of L2 writing: Fluency and proficiency. – AFinLA-e Soveltavan kielitieteen tutkimuksia, 4, 47–59.
Pastuhhova, Olga 2016. Eesti keele kui teise keele kirjutamisprotsessi paranduste multidimensionaalne võrdlus keeleoskustasemeti. [Multi-dimensional comparison of revisions across proficiency levels in the writing process of learners of L2 Estonian.] – Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja, 26, 385–425. https://doi.org/10.5128/LV26.13
Pastuhhova, Olga 2015. Using micro-contexts to describe a writing process in Estonian as a second language across proficiency levels. – Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu aastaraamat, 11, 205–222. http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.13
Schmidt, Richard 1992. Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14 (4), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011189
Schoonen, Rob; Gelderen, Amos van; Glopper, Kees de; Hulstijn, Jan; Simis, Annegien; Snellings, Patrick; Stevenson, Marie 2003. First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. – Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213
Silva, Tony 1993. Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. – TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587400
Skehan, Peter 2003. Task-based instruction. – Language Teaching, 36 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X
Skehan, Peter 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. – Applied Linguistics, 30 (4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Snellings, Patrick; Gelderen, Amos van; Glopper, Kees de 2002. Lexical retrieval: An aspect of fluent second language production that can be enhanced. – Language Learning, 52 (4), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00202
Snellings, Patrick; Gelderen, Amos van; Glopper, Kees de 2004. Validating a test of second language written lexical retrieval: A new measure of fluency in written language production. – Language Testing, 21 (2), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532204lt276oa
Spelman Miller, Kristyan; Lindgren, Eva; Sullivan, Kirk P. H. 2008. The psycholinguistic dimension in second language writing: Opportunities for research and pedagogy using computer keystroke logging. – TESOL Quarterly, 42 (3), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00140.x
Strömqvist, Sven; Karlsson, Henrik 2002. ScriptLog for Windows: User’s Manual. University of Lund: Department of Linguistics, University College of Stavanger: Centre for Reading Research.
Uppstad, Per Henning; Solheim, Oddny Judith 2007. Aspects of fluency in writing. – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36 (2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9034-7
Waes, Luuk van; Leijten, Mariëlle 2015. Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. – Computers and Composition, 38, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
Waes, Luuk van; Leijten, Mariëlle; Weijen, Daphne van 2009. Keystroke logging in writing research: Observing writing processes with InputLog. – GFL Journal, 2 (3), 41–64.
Wengelin, Åsa 2006. Examining pauses in writing: Theory, methods and empirical data. – Kirk P. H. Sullivan, Eva Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications. Oxford: Elsevier, 107–130.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa13.07
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Olga Pastuhhova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1736-2563 (print)
ISSN 2228-0677 (online)
DOI 10.5128/ERYa.1736-2563