Kes vastutab? Liiklusõnnetuses osalejate keeleline konstrueerimine

Katrin Aava

Abstract


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.01   

Reports on traffic accidents carry societal meanings and judgements about the value of human life, role and responsibility of all parties and who is to be blamed. Critical discourse analysis used in this research is a method that allows to detect such hidden meanings of societal agreements and interpretations encoded in texts. To exemplify how the roles of different parties are construed in traffic news, were analysed 26 police reports about traffic accidents that happened on crossroads in October and November 2013. To find out how such framing influences readers in interpreting the text, were questioned 104 respondents.

The text analysis showed that traffic news stories are being framed through the driver’s viewpoint and attention is drawn to the pedestrian’s mistakes (lack of a reflector, dark clothing). Traffic reports are phrased in such a way that accidents happen, their active participants are cars which hit pedestrians and pedestrians who are hit by cars. The questionnaire revealed that the more emphasis is put on the factors that distracted the driver, the more readers perceive pedestrians as responsible for the accident.


Keywords


critical discourse analysis; framing; viewpoint; traffic reports

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abinõude valik jalakäijate ja jalgratturitega toimunud liiklusõnnetuste ning neis kannatanute arvu vähendamiseks: II etapp. [Improvement of road safety situation of vulnerable road users – pedestrians and bicyclists.] Lõpparuanne. Tallinn: Maanteeamet, 2004. http://www.mnt.ee/failid/Kergl.pdf (5.5.2014).

Demerath, Loren; Levinger, David 2003. The social qualities of being on foot: A theoretical analysis of pedestrian activity, community, and culture. – City & Community, 2 (3), 217–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00052

Dijk, Teun A. van 2005. Ideoloogia. Multidistsiplinaarne käsitlus. [Ideology: A Multidisci- plinary Approach.] Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Eetikakoodeks. [Code of Ethics.] Eesti Ajalehtede Liit. http://www.eall.ee/eetikakoodeks. html (27.9.2014).

EKG II = Erelt, Mati; Kasik, Reet; Metslang, Helle; Rajandi, Henno; Ross, Kristiina; Saari, Henn; Tael, Kaja; Vare, Silvi 1993. Eesti keele grammatika II. Süntaks. [Estonian Grammar II. Syntax.] Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.

Fairclough, Norman 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, Norman 1991. Discourse Processes and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, Norman 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, Norman 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.

Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, Norman 2001. Language and Power. Second edition. Harlow: Longman. Fairclough, Norman 2005. Critical discourse analysis in transdisciplinary research. –

R. Wodak, P. Hilton (Eds.). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 53–70.

Fairclough, Norman; Wodak, Ruth 1997. Critical discourse analysis. – Teun van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258–284.

Flowerdew, John 1999. Description and interpretation in critical discourse analysis. – Journal of Pragmatics, 31 (8), 1089–1099. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00049-1 Freund, Peter E. S.; Martin, George T. 1997. Speaking about accidents: The ideology of auto

safety. – Health, 1 (2), 167–182.

Harvey, Lee; Macdonald, Morag 1993. Doing Sociology: A Practical Introduction. Macmillan

Distribution.

Huckin, Thomas 1997. Critical discourse analysis. – Tom Miller (Ed.). Functional Approach

to Written Text: Classroom Application. Wachington. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/

ED417422.pdf#page=87 (15.7.2014).

Härson, Tuuli 2014. Liikluskommunikatsioon: sõnaga surma vastu. – Kaja, 15, 37–38. Kasik, Reet 2008. Meediateksti analüüs: eesmärgid ja metoodika. [Analysis of the media

texts: Aims and methods.] – Reet Kasik (Toim.). Tekstid ja taustad V. Tartu: Tartu

Ülikooli Kirjastus, 10–43.

Laherand, Marika 2008. Kvalitatiivne uurimisviis. [Quantitative Methods.] Tallinn: OÜ

Infotrükk.

Leeuwen, Theo van 1996. The representation of social actors. – Carmen Rosa Caldas-

Coulthard, Malcolm Coulthard (Eds.). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Dis-

course Analysis. London: Routledge, 32–70.

Liiklusseadus 2010. [Traffic Act.] https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/102072013012 (29.6.2014). McQuail, Denis 2000. McQuaili massikommunikatsiooni teooria. [McQuail’s Mass Com-

munication Theory.] Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.

Oatman-Stanford, Hunter 2014. Murder machines: Why cars will kill 30,000 Americans

this year. http://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/murder-machines/ (28.7.2014). Pan, Zhondang; Kosicki, Gerald M. 2010. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. – Political Communication, 10 (1), 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.

Roberts, Ian; Wentz, Reinhard; Edwards, Phil 2006. Car manufacturer and global road safety: A word frequency analysis of road safety documents. – Injury Prevention, 12 (5), 320–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2006.012849

Sheller, Mimi; Urry, John 2000. The city and car. – International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24 (4), 737–751. http://www.livingrail.eu/images/pdf/2000_ sheller_urry_the_city_and_the_car.pdf (20.8.2014).

Serafini, Frank 2003. Informing our practice: Modernist, transactional, and critical per- spectives on children’s literature and reading instruction. – Reading Online, 6 (6). http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=serafini/index.html (12.8.2012).

Vallières, Lucie 2006. Disciplining Pedestrians? A Critical Analysis of Traffic Safety Dis- courses. MA thesis. Simon Fraser University.

Whatley, Marianne H. 1988. Raging hormones and powerful cars: The construction of men’s sexuality in school sex education and popular adolescent films. – Journal of Educa- tion, 170 (3), 100–121.

Widdowson, Henry G. 1998. The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis. – Applied Linguistics, 19 (1), 136–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.136

Wodak, Ruth 1996. Disorders of Discourse. London–New York: Longman.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Katrin Aava

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1736-2563 (print)
ISSN 2228-0677 (online)
DOI 10.5128/ERYa.1736-2563